Just a quick little muse today reading the paper today and had to get something off my chest, I haven't been on here in a while but look at the above pictures......one was the infamous nipple slip, the other one is a guy buried under Haiti's infrastructure dead, just an absolute travesty to happen down there.
What I can't understand is this the first picture caused the entire country to get flipped upside down, I'm watching games on tape delay, Live shows ditto, even Howard stern had to move to satellite because god forbid someone heard the word F$ck!, does it hurt anyone to say that, is it damaging anyone to hear that. What's the worst thing to happen if a 12 year sees Janet's breasts, why doesn't anyone ask these pertinent questions? Their considered to be "graphic" to the majority of America and therefore we should keep obscenities and boobs out of the viewing public because they are bad.
Now to contrast that the below picture is of a dead person buried under rubble, I consider this to be 10 X's more graphic than any pair of boobs, even A cups. I am going to bed tonight having nightmares of this poor Haitian man lying under rubble, if I had children I wouldn't want them to see this, I think this is a lot more damaging than Janet's nipples. Yet, this is the cover of the NY Post today and no one seems to have any sort of problems with this but me.
Boobs or Dead Bodies? What do you think is worse or more damaging to 12 year olds?
1 comments:
What an enjoyable read. Is it wrong of me to feel happy? Not because of the unfortunate state of our economy, but for the embarrassment the public is feeling for having elected this disgrace of a president. I feel like sticking my finger out and yelling " I told ya so" in a really immature and obnoxious manner.
Post a Comment